Corruption and Poor Governance
Summary – Acknowledgement – Introduction – Why Should We Help? – The Benefits – The Venture Itself – How to Avoid the Marie Antoinette Syndrome – The Action Plan – Conclusion – Selected Bibliography
The argument that there is no point in giving ODA to Africa because of its corruption is false. While it is true that corruption occurs, it is much less prevalent than it was in the early 1990′s. Many African countries have transformed themselves into democracies since then and are making concentrated attempts to eradicate corruption. (Sachs, 2005, p. 315) We in Canada would be wise to not belabour this argument given our own previous government’s sorry record of dishonesty and sponsorship scandals.
Another common argument against giving ODA is that Africa suffers from poor governance. Without better governance, the argument goes, money is wasted and aid is therefore undeserved. However, studies have shown that African countries do not suffer from worse governance than other poverty-stricken countries, even those who have recently improved their economic lot and begun to eradicate extreme poverty. They are on a par. Instead, it is Africa’s geography and disease that have held it back from overcoming poverty. (Sachs, 2005, p. 312-313)
Read More: It’s Their Own Fault If They Are Poor – Jared Diamond and Western (Cargo) – Ineffective Aid – Muhammad Yunus and Microcredit – Unscrupulous People – The System – Grameen Bank – It Doesn’t Affect Us, So Why Should We Care? – The Poor Will Always Be With Us – There Is No Point In Giving Aid – Where Does All The Money Go? – Africa’s Onerous Challenges – Africa’s Extreme Poverty – Corruption and Poor Governance – Lack of Modern Values and Free Market Economies – A Population Explosion? – Why Not Leave It to the United Nations and the World’s Governments? – The UN – The Governments of the World – Grassroots Movements





